Difference between revisions of "First results"
(→People) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=== Objective: === | === Objective: === | ||
− | ==== To see whether species determination by simple sequencing, as we have already done for bacteria (with the universal 16S primers), will be possible. ==== | + | ==== To see whether species determination by simple PCR then sequencing, as we have already done for bacteria (with the universal 16S primers), will be possible. ==== |
+ | Yngvar found some references describing protocols with ribosomal DNA 'internal transcribed spacer' (ITS) sequences that can be used as 'bar-coding' primers for fungus, in particular, a protocol from the Kennedy Lab by L. Higgins (2012). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unfortunately, this reference did not have the actual primer sequences in it, although it had a great overview image of the ribosomal DNA, which we reproduce roughly here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <big>'''ITS1'''**></big> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <big><18S rDNA | 1st Internal Transcribed Spacer | 5.8S rDNA | 2nd Internal Transcribed Spacer | 28S rDNA></big> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <big><**'''ITS4'''</big> | ||
+ | |||
+ | To note, ribosomal genes come in big repeated clusters in most organisms, and this is the general layout of one of the standard repeats. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we got down to the sequence level, in various references, we realised that some published sequences were not correctly transcribed, or at least, the ITS1 primer was missing a T in a few of the references (even in a PCR Protocol book from Cold Spring Harbor, put out in 1990). | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, the following two primers, in the end, were also in several publications (and fit better by sequence comparisons than without the extra T), and are the ones we used: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ITS 1 5'TCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG and | ||
+ | |||
+ | ITS 4 5'TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC | ||
+ | |||
+ | These are generally as published [[DOI: 10.2174/1874070702014010070|here]] (open access), thanks to Z. Haque, et al... =) | ||
+ | |||
+ | (As indicated in the schematic above, the ITS1 sequence come from within the 18S rDNA sequence, while the ITS4 is from the 28S rDNA sequence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first test of these primers was performed in our lab on February 3 2022, and we made an [https://www.evernote.com/shard/s586/sh/3cf6ffd6-fddc-d0e5-1faa-bec7d8e24d1b/36a5c24ba03e88f3bcde5b49e7cd4d27 evernote protocol with details]about comparing fresh, freeze/thawed and simple 'touch with a toothpick' comparisons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For one mycelia type, shiitake, all three reactions worked well, for another, only after the freeze-thaw was good, for instance. Ultimately we got sequences for all three samples, as shown below: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | >BWA541_12485414_12485414 | ||
+ | |||
+ | AGAATCCTAATGGGAAGTTGTTGCTGGCCTCTAGGGGCATGTGCACGCTTCACTAGTCTTTCAACCACCTGTGAACTTTT | ||
+ | |||
+ | GATAGATCTGTGAAGTCGTCTCTCAAGTCGTTAGACTTGGTTTGCTGGGATGTAAACGTCTCGGTGTGACTACGCAGTCT | ||
+ | |||
+ | ATTTACTTATAACACCCCAAATGTATGTCTACGAATGTCATTTAAAGGGCCTTGTGCCTATAAACCATAATACAACTTTC | ||
+ | |||
+ | AACAACGGATCTCTTGGCTCTCGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTGCAGAATTCAGTGA | ||
+ | |||
+ | ATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACCTTGCGCCCCTTGGTATTCCGAGGGGCATGCCTGTTTGAGTGTCATTAAATTCTCAAA | ||
+ | |||
+ | CTCACTCTGGTTTTTCCAATTGTGATGTTTGGATTGTTGGGGGCTGCTGGCCTTGACAGGTCGGCTCCTCTTAAATGCAT | ||
+ | |||
+ | TAGCAGGACTTCTCATTGCCTCTGCGCATGATGTGATAATTATCACTCATCAATAGCACGCATGAATAGAGTTTGGCTCT | ||
+ | |||
+ | CTAACCGTCCGCAAGGACAATTTGACAATTTGACCTCAAATCAGGTAGGACTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATCAATAAG | ||
+ | |||
+ | CC | ||
+ | |||
+ | KP mycelia and | ||
+ | |||
+ | yes! Pleurotus eryngii | ||
+ | |||
+ | identical 627bp | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | >BWA542_12485421_12485421 | ||
+ | |||
+ | AATTAAGATGGGCCTTTGCTAGTTTTCTAGCGAATGGTTCATTCTTTTTTACTGTGAACTGTTTTAATTTTTCAGCGTCT | ||
+ | |||
+ | GAGGAATGTCTTTTAGCCATAGGGATAGGCTACTAGAATGTTAACCGAGCTGAAAGTCAGGCTTAGGCCTGGTATCCTAT | ||
+ | |||
+ | TAATTATTTACCAAAAGAATTCAGTATTATAATTGTAACATAAGCGTAAAAAACTTATAAAACAACTTTTAACAACGGAT | ||
+ | |||
+ | CTCTTGGTTCTCGCATCGATGAAGAACGTAGCAAAGTGCGATAACTAGTGTGAATTGCATATTCAGTGAATCATCGAGTC | ||
+ | |||
+ | TTTGAACGCAACTTGCGCTCAATGGTATTCCATTGAGCACGCCTGTTTCAGTATCAAAAACACCCCACATTCATAATTTT | ||
+ | |||
+ | GTTGTGAATGGAATTGAGAGTTTCGGCTTTATTGCTGAATTCTTTAAAATTATTAGGCCTGAACTATTGTTCTTTCTGCC | ||
+ | |||
+ | TGAACATTTTTTTAATATAAAGGAATGCTCTAGTAAAAAGACTATCTCTGGGGCCTCCCAAATAAATCATTCTTAAATTT | ||
+ | |||
+ | GATCTGAAATCAGGCGGGATTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATCATAAGA | ||
+ | |||
+ | PB mold thing? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mucor hiemalis? | ||
+ | |||
+ | <nowiki>https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/mucor-hiemalis</nowiki> | ||
+ | |||
+ | uncultured fungus | ||
+ | |||
+ | Beauveria bassiana | ||
+ | |||
+ | ?? | ||
+ | |||
+ | 609bp identity | ||
+ | |||
+ | can come with parasite bug (also balloons - as seen!) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | >BWA543_12485438_12485438 | ||
+ | |||
+ | TCCTCCTCCGATTTCTATTCATCCACCTGTGCACTTTTTGTAGGAGTTCTTTCATCGGGTTTTTGAAGGTGCTCATTATG | ||
+ | |||
+ | AGTTACTTGAAAAGACTAGTTGACAAGGCTTCTATGTTCTTATAAACCATCGAAGTATGTTATAGAATGATCTCGTTATT | ||
+ | |||
+ | GGGACTTTATTGACCCTTTAAACTTAATACAACTTTCAGCAACGGATCTCTTGGCTCTCCCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCG | ||
+ | |||
+ | AAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTGCAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACCTTGCGCCCTCTGGTATTCCG | ||
+ | |||
+ | GAGGGCATGCCTGTTTGAGTGTCATTAAATTCTCAACTTTATAAGTTTTTTACTTATTAAAGC | ||
+ | |||
+ | only 381/383 identity | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lentinula edodes | ||
+ | |||
+ | and that is Shiitake!! | ||
+ | |||
+ | yay! |
Revision as of 14:56, 6 February 2023
Introduction
This is a part of the project Fun_with_fungi. It is about experiments related to mycelial biodiversity.
People
Contact and lead: Yngvar
Participants: Rachel, other Hackuarium members, maybe *you*?
Objective:
To see whether species determination by simple PCR then sequencing, as we have already done for bacteria (with the universal 16S primers), will be possible.
Yngvar found some references describing protocols with ribosomal DNA 'internal transcribed spacer' (ITS) sequences that can be used as 'bar-coding' primers for fungus, in particular, a protocol from the Kennedy Lab by L. Higgins (2012).
Unfortunately, this reference did not have the actual primer sequences in it, although it had a great overview image of the ribosomal DNA, which we reproduce roughly here:
ITS1**>
<18S rDNA | 1st Internal Transcribed Spacer | 5.8S rDNA | 2nd Internal Transcribed Spacer | 28S rDNA>
<**ITS4
To note, ribosomal genes come in big repeated clusters in most organisms, and this is the general layout of one of the standard repeats.
When we got down to the sequence level, in various references, we realised that some published sequences were not correctly transcribed, or at least, the ITS1 primer was missing a T in a few of the references (even in a PCR Protocol book from Cold Spring Harbor, put out in 1990).
However, the following two primers, in the end, were also in several publications (and fit better by sequence comparisons than without the extra T), and are the ones we used:
ITS 1 5'TCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG and
ITS 4 5'TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
These are generally as published here (open access), thanks to Z. Haque, et al... =)
(As indicated in the schematic above, the ITS1 sequence come from within the 18S rDNA sequence, while the ITS4 is from the 28S rDNA sequence.
The first test of these primers was performed in our lab on February 3 2022, and we made an evernote protocol with detailsabout comparing fresh, freeze/thawed and simple 'touch with a toothpick' comparisons.
For one mycelia type, shiitake, all three reactions worked well, for another, only after the freeze-thaw was good, for instance. Ultimately we got sequences for all three samples, as shown below:
>BWA541_12485414_12485414
AGAATCCTAATGGGAAGTTGTTGCTGGCCTCTAGGGGCATGTGCACGCTTCACTAGTCTTTCAACCACCTGTGAACTTTT
GATAGATCTGTGAAGTCGTCTCTCAAGTCGTTAGACTTGGTTTGCTGGGATGTAAACGTCTCGGTGTGACTACGCAGTCT
ATTTACTTATAACACCCCAAATGTATGTCTACGAATGTCATTTAAAGGGCCTTGTGCCTATAAACCATAATACAACTTTC
AACAACGGATCTCTTGGCTCTCGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTGCAGAATTCAGTGA
ATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACCTTGCGCCCCTTGGTATTCCGAGGGGCATGCCTGTTTGAGTGTCATTAAATTCTCAAA
CTCACTCTGGTTTTTCCAATTGTGATGTTTGGATTGTTGGGGGCTGCTGGCCTTGACAGGTCGGCTCCTCTTAAATGCAT
TAGCAGGACTTCTCATTGCCTCTGCGCATGATGTGATAATTATCACTCATCAATAGCACGCATGAATAGAGTTTGGCTCT
CTAACCGTCCGCAAGGACAATTTGACAATTTGACCTCAAATCAGGTAGGACTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATCAATAAG
CC
KP mycelia and
yes! Pleurotus eryngii
identical 627bp
>BWA542_12485421_12485421
AATTAAGATGGGCCTTTGCTAGTTTTCTAGCGAATGGTTCATTCTTTTTTACTGTGAACTGTTTTAATTTTTCAGCGTCT
GAGGAATGTCTTTTAGCCATAGGGATAGGCTACTAGAATGTTAACCGAGCTGAAAGTCAGGCTTAGGCCTGGTATCCTAT
TAATTATTTACCAAAAGAATTCAGTATTATAATTGTAACATAAGCGTAAAAAACTTATAAAACAACTTTTAACAACGGAT
CTCTTGGTTCTCGCATCGATGAAGAACGTAGCAAAGTGCGATAACTAGTGTGAATTGCATATTCAGTGAATCATCGAGTC
TTTGAACGCAACTTGCGCTCAATGGTATTCCATTGAGCACGCCTGTTTCAGTATCAAAAACACCCCACATTCATAATTTT
GTTGTGAATGGAATTGAGAGTTTCGGCTTTATTGCTGAATTCTTTAAAATTATTAGGCCTGAACTATTGTTCTTTCTGCC
TGAACATTTTTTTAATATAAAGGAATGCTCTAGTAAAAAGACTATCTCTGGGGCCTCCCAAATAAATCATTCTTAAATTT
GATCTGAAATCAGGCGGGATTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATCATAAGA
PB mold thing?
Mucor hiemalis?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/mucor-hiemalis
uncultured fungus
Beauveria bassiana
??
609bp identity
can come with parasite bug (also balloons - as seen!)
>BWA543_12485438_12485438
TCCTCCTCCGATTTCTATTCATCCACCTGTGCACTTTTTGTAGGAGTTCTTTCATCGGGTTTTTGAAGGTGCTCATTATG
AGTTACTTGAAAAGACTAGTTGACAAGGCTTCTATGTTCTTATAAACCATCGAAGTATGTTATAGAATGATCTCGTTATT
GGGACTTTATTGACCCTTTAAACTTAATACAACTTTCAGCAACGGATCTCTTGGCTCTCCCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCG
AAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTGCAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACCTTGCGCCCTCTGGTATTCCG
GAGGGCATGCCTGTTTGAGTGTCATTAAATTCTCAACTTTATAAGTTTTTTACTTATTAAAGC
only 381/383 identity
Lentinula edodes
and that is Shiitake!!
yay!