Difference between revisions of "Microgrant Process Review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===How to announce results and follow-up with members applying=== | ===How to announce results and follow-up with members applying=== | ||
==Recommendations== | ==Recommendations== | ||
| − | the usual system with at least 2 members of board saying it is ok, after a presentation at an open hackuarium evening seems fine to RA. | + | the usual system with at least 2 members of board saying it is ok, after a presentation at an open hackuarium evening, seems fine to RA. |
===Why?=== | ===Why?=== | ||
===How to apply=== | ===How to apply=== | ||
===How to review an application and vote=== | ===How to review an application and vote=== | ||
===How to announce results and follow-up with members applying=== | ===How to announce results and follow-up with members applying=== | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 9 March 2017
(Work in Progress)
Microgrant Process Review is a short project started by Shalf in his role as Board Member to propose and implement improvements to this important internal tool we have as an association to support and nurture great stuff.
20170308 Creating page, starting collecting past conversations about it 20170309 Vote upon proposal below at the Board Meeting
Proposal
State of the Microgrant Process
Why?
How to apply
How to review an application and vote
How to announce results and follow-up with members applying
Recommendations
the usual system with at least 2 members of board saying it is ok, after a presentation at an open hackuarium evening, seems fine to RA.