AGiR! for genomic integrity

Genomic integrity is a new 'big picture' concept to aid public health efforts and basically includes all the molecular genetic details of cells! So many things we commonly choose to do can impact genomic integrity, also potentially affecting future generations!

At the Hackuarium, AGiR! hopes to really get some citizen science action going - developing DIYbio methods to readily assay *your very own* cells for DNA damage, using classic (circa 1980s) techniques. If these can still be sold in 'kits,' maybe it will also be simple to make them available to all for open source efforts?
Here is the basic plan: using inner cheek cells for micronuclei and comet assays!
Watch this space for more info and visit
the AGiR! site

Introduction

Context

This is a part of a new Hackuarium project on genomic integrity.
This wiki page is under construction, and will help keep track as we develop open source simple protocols of two classic methods for quantitation of DNA damage in human cells, the micronuclei and comet assays.

People

Contact and lead:

• Rachel Aronoff

Participants:

• maybe you?!

Main Goals

Genomic integrity is a big picture concept which includes basically all the molecular genetic details of cells (from RNAs to DNAs and the epigenetic marks for proper gene expression), and thus is a topic that can be explored in several ways. For the genomic integrity project at the Hackuarium the focus will be on directly quantifying DNA damage. Comet and micronuclei assays were developed in the 1980s and publications about use of these assays on human cheek cells are already in the literature. These methods, as open source protocols, will encourage citizen science and raise awareness. Additionally, they can provide an easily "workshopable" way to show people more about their own cells, while learning how to assess DNA damage.
In other words, this experiment can be used as a gateway, to demonstrate and raise awareness for everyone on the damage possible from many common substances or activities - on your own cells, your own genetic information!
In the scope of Hackuarium activities, mammalian cell cultures are still (april 2016) a no go, but freshly isolated cheek cells from individuals can be used to do tests on DNA damaging compounds or activities. Such 'ex situ' assays might seem more attractive, especially if potentially toxic compounds are tested! (but the caveat is that it is only after the metabolism of some compounds that the DNA-damaging effects are 'revealed' - for example alcohol to DNA-damaging aldehydes…)
In order to further investigate compounds that might cause DNA damage, a classic test of bacterial reversion (i.e. the Ames test) or on bulk DNA may also be nice to establish at the Hackuarium.
If enough people follow the 'open source' protocol(s) that we develop to follow controlled exposure protocols or test substances directly on their isolated cheek cells, and clearly significant effects are observed, we may even be able to corroborate or refute previous works in the literature. (Please go to the bottom of the page, for one concrete example being considered.)
Your ideas and comments are welcome throughout btw!

Objectives

• Obtain ready results with cheek cells for the comet and micronuclei assays

• Put together the open source protocol, with suggestions for standard tests and controls

• Demonstrate methods and 'share the love' with other biohacker groups (La Paillasse etc.)

• Study the feasibility of further methods that could contribute to this project - i.e. an assay on either bacterial or bulk DNA

Cheek cells are continually renewing epithelial cells and are about 50 micrometers in diameter.

Three cheek cells imaged on the scope at the Hackuarium. Some methylene blue stain may be visible in the most 'in focus' nucleus - left, middle cell.

Background & Inspiration

Here is the link to the Prezi Rachel presented (13apr16) at an Open hackuarium night! Prezi on DIYbio for Genomic integrity!

Some theory

More on comet cells and micronuclei to come soon! But in the meantime, here are the references to the cheek cell papers mentioned in the presentation (and in the prezi):
Szeto et al (2005) Mutation Research 578:371-381
(In this paper, green tea is also shown to be protective.)
dos Santos Rocha et al (2014) Genetics and Molecular Biology, 37(4)702-707
(This paper looks at micronuclei in cheek cells (and also analyses apoptosis) from mouthwash and alcohol users.)

Inspiration / Similar projects

Inspiration: good pages to come

• [http://]
• [Link 2]

Setup description

General principle for both assays: looking at treated cells on slides through a microscope, imaging and quantitating the effects (i.e. counting number of cells with micronuclei relative to the total number of cells, or determining the length of the 'comet tail' - the longer the 'tail' the more DNA breaks - on average.
The comet assay requires more treatments and a short 'electrophoresis' step, as compared to the micronuclei assay.

Necessary Materials

• Interested citizen scientists
• A toothbrush for gentle collection of the cheek cells
• Lab equipment for the cheek cell 'comet' and micronuclei assays

• Microscope, glass slides
• Lab 'consumables' pipets and tips, beakers
• Agarose, and gel running apparatus for embedding cells, treatments (triton, protease, EDTA, buffer solutions, etc.) and nucleoid migration (for the comet assay)

• Mercury Lamp Setup and filters for fluorescent dye detection.
• Could also try to design a transilluminator suitable for cellular resolution (UV/Fluo as usual for comets) when imaging (to look for open source models)

• Other reagents and histochemical stains (methylene blue)
• Hydrogen peroxide for positive control cells (oxidative damage)
• Antioxidant molecules as possible 'protective' intervention

• • More details to come (What, size | quantity | where to get it | price / unit)

Parameters for the Open Source Protocol

To get baseline conditions first and compare with the standard lab technique

then To vary | Values

p1 |

p2 |

Constants (Key elements of set-up)

c1 |

c2

To measure/ observe

m1

m2

Protocol (Plan)

Phase 1

do what | frequency | duration

Lab Notebook & News (Real)

Protocols and measurements to be linked from here: [link to other doc]

Run / prototype #2

What's new compared to #1:

Really fun initial citizen science trial - testing chocolate's effects on genomic integrity

As one fun standard protocol for the open source 'citizen science' procedure, which might help resolve controversies in the literature even… for instance, about flavanols in chocolate and what else they might be good for (cardiovascular health, cognition, etc…).
There have been two publications based on limited numbers of subjects in terms of flavanols from chocolate protecting skin cells from UV light, based on a sort of 'quantitative skin burn' method - measuring the so-called minimal erythema dose). Here are the abstracts from two interesting publications in that regard.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19735513
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970388
One of course found a significant effect and the other no significant UV protection of skin. (However a 'Net temple elasticity increased slightly but significantly by 0.09 ± 0.12 mm in the HFC group at 12 weeks compared to 0.02 ± 0.12 mm in the LFC group (MD: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.12 )' and this could be very interesting for many of us! 30g of chocolate a day was the dose, for 12 weeks and a 3 week washout in this study. Have a look!)

Maybe in the terms of this project, using cheek cells to assess both basal damage levels and damage levels in response to tests of ex situ effects of differing concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, for instance, after eating chocolate with high or low flavanol levels, will be more meaningful than that 'skin burn' model, based on just 30 people.
Furthermore, with citizen scientists everywhere involved, we may be able to get much bigger numbers than those 2 previous works.
A collaboration with a very keen 'chocolatier' from Gruyere may help us! We will try to see which of his dark chocolates contains the most flavanols (and perhaps he will modify some steps in the production process to increase the levels found!) and had a 'degustation' of his grand cru chocolates yesterday! (25 may 2016)

If you are interested in more information and a closer look at the results (no significant preference was found for the 4 different chocolates, but 2 were more preferred! And eating any of them made a commercial brand less attractive for many participants!), then there will be a new page about this soon!

Recommendation + next steps

spread the word! www.genomicintegrity.org